Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- clones:b:baker_s_huanucoensis [2026/01/05 09:25] – Created from the form at clones:add_clone medicactus
+++ clones:b:baker_s_huanucoensis [2026/01/05 09:27] (current) – medicactus
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Baker's Huanucoensis ======
-created by: medicactus
+{{:clones:b:bakerhuano.png?800|}} Photo Credit: Kevin Sansalone
+===== Description =====
+No specific botanical description regarding rib count, spine length/color, or epidermis color is available from the provided source material.
-{{tag>pachanoi Huanucoensis}}
+===== History & Origin =====
+The 'Baker's Huanucoensis' is named after botanist and nurseryman Bill Baker (1959-2009). It is understood that this plant, like the 'bridgesii 5452', originates from Baker's nursery, which was located in Reseda, CA. This clarifies that the "Baker" in "Baker's Huanucoensis" refers to the same individual as the "Baker" in other well-known clones such as 'bridgesii 5452'.
-===== Description =====
+===== Cultivation Notes =====
-tbd
+No specific cultivation advice is available from the provided source material.
+===== Community Discussion & Citations =====
+//Analysis of the provided discussion.//
+The discussion primarily revolves around clarifying the identity of "Baker" and its connection to other named clones. Initial confusion regarding whether "Baker's Huanucoensis" was distinct from "BAKER5452" was addressed by a more detailed historical account, confirming a shared origin from botanist Bill Baker.
+^ Speaker ^ Confidence Score ^ Key Insight/Quote ^
+| George Huang | 7 | "Bill is short for William, and both plants trace back to botanist/nurseryman Bill Baker (1959-2009) who had a Resda, CA nursery." |
+===== Credibility Notes =====
+George Huang's confidence score of 7 is based on the detailed historical information provided, including specific dates (birth/death of Bill Baker) and location (Reseda, CA nursery). This level of detail and the correction of a previous statement indicate a well-informed perspective. Mike Johns received a lower score (3) due to his statement being directly contradicted by George Huang, who provided more specific, verifiable historical context. None of the user-specified 10/10 experts (Lawrence Smith, Jeremy Mercado, Bob Baker) were present in the discussion.