Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- clones:b:blue_meanie [2026/07/03 00:45] – gate contributor confidence to trusted groups (@trusted_grower/@admin) clonebot
+++ clones:b:blue_meanie [2026/07/03 03:37] (current) – gate discussion/citations/confidence/credibility sections to trusted groups clonebot
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
   * **Environment:** Bridgesii-type clones like Blue Meanie prefer environments that do not allow the roots to remain wet for extended periods, though they respond well to mineral-heavy feeding.
+<ifauth @trusted_grower,@admin>
 ===== Community Discussion & Citations =====
 //The discussion centers on the origin of the name and the plant's notorious difficulty regarding fungal health. There is a consensus that "Wisdom" is the primary source of the named clone, though its presence in the trade under other names is suspected.//
@@ Line 24: / Line 25: @@
 | 2024 (approx) | Brian Bennett | "I thought that one was distributed by wisdom. That's who I got mine from a long time ago" |
-<ifauth @trusted_grower,@admin>
 ===== Contributor Confidence =====
 //Visible to trusted reviewers only.//
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 | Phillip Gray | 7/10 |
 | Brian Bennett | 7/10 |
-</ifauth>
 ===== Credibility Notes =====
 High confidence scores were assigned to Eric Charles Cox due to his definitive claim regarding the collector (Wisdom Cretan) and the specific location of the find (San Jose). James Buchanan received a high score for providing detailed, technically-grounded cultivation strategies that align with known //T. bridgesii// requirements. Phillip Gray and Brian Bennett provided consistent corroboration of the primary source, reinforcing the historical narrative.
+</ifauth>