User Tools

Site Tools


clones:m:max_01

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
clones:m:max_01 [2026/07/02 20:50] – add auto-generated banner (transparency) clonebotclones:m:max_01 [2026/07/03 03:37] (current) – gate discussion/citations/confidence/credibility sections to trusted groups clonebot
Line 17: Line 17:
 Max-01 responds well to grafting, with documented success using Trichocereus "PC" and Trichocereus grandiflorus as rootstocks. For optimal growth, it should be transitioned to full sun, which encourages a thicker caliper and longer spine development. Max-01 responds well to grafting, with documented success using Trichocereus "PC" and Trichocereus grandiflorus as rootstocks. For optimal growth, it should be transitioned to full sun, which encourages a thicker caliper and longer spine development.
  
 +<ifauth @trusted_grower,@admin>
 ===== Community Discussion & Citations ===== ===== Community Discussion & Citations =====
 //Analysis of the discussion.// //Analysis of the discussion.//
 The community discussion focuses on verifying the identity of a specimen as Max-01. Members trace the clone's provenance back to the salvaged Los Angeles collection and describe its unique morphological traits, defending its status as a distinct, high-quality clone rather than an arbitrary "new name" created for market speculation. The community discussion focuses on verifying the identity of a specimen as Max-01. Members trace the clone's provenance back to the salvaged Los Angeles collection and describe its unique morphological traits, defending its status as a distinct, high-quality clone rather than an arbitrary "new name" created for market speculation.
  
-^ Date ^ Speaker ^ Confidence Score ^ Key Insight/Quote ^ +^ Date ^ Speaker ^ Key Insight/Quote ^ 
-| 2024 (approx) | Mark Ostrom | 7 | "These are both Max-01. First grafted to pc, second degrafted for grandiflores if I remember correctly." | +| 2024 (approx) | Mark Ostrom | "These are both Max-01. First grafted to pc, second degrafted for grandiflores if I remember correctly." | 
-| 2024 (approx) | Bryan Harris | 7 | "It can get very fat and nice and even longer spined in full sun. One of my favorites." | +| 2024 (approx) | Bryan Harris | "It can get very fat and nice and even longer spined in full sun. One of my favorites." | 
-| 2024 (approx) | James Dugan | 8 | "Max or MX-01 came from a garden of a deceased Los Angeles cactus and succulent society president that was bought some years back. The plant was bulldozed in a tree removal last year but Desmond Stetson saved a bunch of pieces. It's a stunner for sure." | +| 2024 (approx) | James Dugan | "Max or MX-01 came from a garden of a deceased Los Angeles cactus and succulent society president that was bought some years back. The plant was bulldozed in a tree removal last year but Desmond Stetson saved a bunch of pieces. It's a stunner for sure." | 
-| 2024 (approx) | Daniel Hackbarth | 8 | "Really interesting protrusions subtending each areole. When the rib is viewed from the side, the notch looks really long, arcing down the entirety of the protrusion. Strange enough that you'd swear it's monstrose, though I don't think it is, really." |+| 2024 (approx) | Daniel Hackbarth | "Really interesting protrusions subtending each areole. When the rib is viewed from the side, the notch looks really long, arcing down the entirety of the protrusion. Strange enough that you'd swear it's monstrose, though I don't think it is, really." | 
 + 
 +===== Contributor Confidence ===== 
 +//Visible to trusted reviewers only.// 
 + 
 +^ Contributor ^ Confidence ^ 
 +| Mark Ostrom | 7/10 | 
 +| Bryan Harris | 7/10 | 
 +| James Dugan | 8/10 | 
 +| Daniel Hackbarth | 8/10 | 
  
 ===== Credibility Notes ===== ===== Credibility Notes =====
-James Dugan and Daniel Hackbarth received high credibility scores (8/10) for providing detailed, specific historical provenance and morphological descriptions that help distinguish the clone. Mark Ostrom and Bryan Harris received scores of 7/10 as they are direct growers of the clone with firsthand knowledge of its cultivation habits, lineage, and propagation history.+James Dugan and Daniel Hackbarth received high credibility scores for providing detailed, specific historical provenance and morphological descriptions that help distinguish the clone. Mark Ostrom and Bryan Harris received scoresas they are direct growers of the clone with firsthand knowledge of its cultivation habits, lineage, and propagation history. 
 +</ifauth>
clones/m/max_01.1783025403.txt.gz · Last modified: by clonebot