Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- clones:m:max_01 [2026/07/03 00:45] – gate contributor confidence to trusted groups (@trusted_grower/@admin) clonebot
+++ clones:m:max_01 [2026/07/03 03:37] (current) – gate discussion/citations/confidence/credibility sections to trusted groups clonebot
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Max-01 responds well to grafting, with documented success using Trichocereus "PC" and Trichocereus grandiflorus as rootstocks. For optimal growth, it should be transitioned to full sun, which encourages a thicker caliper and longer spine development.
+<ifauth @trusted_grower,@admin>
 ===== Community Discussion & Citations =====
 //Analysis of the discussion.//
@@ Line 27: / Line 28: @@
 | 2024 (approx) | Daniel Hackbarth | "Really interesting protrusions subtending each areole. When the rib is viewed from the side, the notch looks really long, arcing down the entirety of the protrusion. Strange enough that you'd swear it's monstrose, though I don't think it is, really." |
-<ifauth @trusted_grower,@admin>
 ===== Contributor Confidence =====
 //Visible to trusted reviewers only.//
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 | James Dugan | 8/10 |
 | Daniel Hackbarth | 8/10 |
-</ifauth>
 ===== Credibility Notes =====
-James Dugan and Daniel Hackbarth received high credibility scores (8/10) for providing detailed, specific historical provenance and morphological descriptions that help distinguish the clone. Mark Ostrom and Bryan Harris received scores of 7/10 as they are direct growers of the clone with firsthand knowledge of its cultivation habits, lineage, and propagation history.
+James Dugan and Daniel Hackbarth received high credibility scores for providing detailed, specific historical provenance and morphological descriptions that help distinguish the clone. Mark Ostrom and Bryan Harris received scoresas they are direct growers of the clone with firsthand knowledge of its cultivation habits, lineage, and propagation history.
+</ifauth>