Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- clones:s:sugar_magnolia [2026/07/02 20:49] – add auto-generated banner (transparency) clonebot
+++ clones:s:sugar_magnolia [2026/07/03 03:36] (current) – gate discussion/citations/confidence/credibility sections to trusted groups clonebot
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
   * **Light:** Bright, filtered light to full sun, depending on local climate intensity. Glaucous clones often benefit from strong light to develop their characteristic blue coloration, though acclimation is necessary to prevent sunburn.
+<ifauth @trusted_grower,@admin>
 ===== Community Discussion & Citations =====
 //Analysis of the discussion.//
 The community discussion centers on the provenance of the clone, tracing it back to a 2014 seedling batch. Members of the community express appreciation for the clone's distribution, its connection to Grateful Dead themes ("grateful energy"), and the history shared by the selector.
-^ Date ^ Speaker ^ Confidence Score ^ Key Insight/Quote ^
+^ Date ^ Speaker ^ Key Insight/Quote ^
-| 2022 (approx) | Gee Bee | 10 | "I was lucky enough to get a few of Richo’s seedlings back in 2014, Sugar Magnolia resulted from one of them." |
+| 2022 (approx) | Gee Bee | "I was lucky enough to get a few of Richo’s seedlings back in 2014, Sugar Magnolia resulted from one of them." |
+===== Contributor Confidence =====
+//Visible to trusted reviewers only.//
+^ Contributor ^ Confidence ^
+| Gee Bee | 10/10 |
 ===== Credibility Notes =====
-Gee Bee is recognized as an expert source (10/10) regarding this cultivar, as they are the original grower who selected, named, and distributed the clone, providing direct historical context and dates. Other participants in the discussion (Bart Tabels, Brandon Allinger) offered appreciative commentary but did not provide additional historical or botanical data, and thus fell below the confidence threshold for direct quotation.
+Gee Bee is recognized as an expert source regarding this cultivar, as they are the original grower who selected, named, and distributed the clone, providing direct historical context and dates. Other participants in the discussion (Bart Tabels, Brandon Allinger) offered appreciative commentary but did not provide additional historical or botanical data, and thus fell below the confidence threshold for direct quotation.
+</ifauth>